Skip navigation
Research Report

Guide to Building an Impactful Facilities Dashboard

Ann Forman Lippens, Managing Director, Research

Facilities leaders have access to an unprecedented amount of data. To better organize metrics and inform decision-making, leaders are turning to operational dashboards.

This publication explores how to build a facilities dashboard. It includes over 700 facilities performance metrics with guidance on filtering, selecting, and tracking the most essential ones. It also demonstrates the best ways to display and share these metrics internally and with campus stakeholders.

Below you can learn more about each section, review example dashboards, or download the study as a whole.

Determine your best-fit performance management tool

Importantly, dashboards should not be confused with scorecards. Although both represent tools to track progress on key metrics, dashboards and scorecards differ in their content and ultimate goal.

Scorecards

Scorecards track progress toward achievement of strategic objectives. The goal of a scorecard is to explicitly link unit activities to institutional goals. Facilities leaders use this tool to clearly demonstrate to other senior leaders how their unit advances broader institutional priorities.

Read More

Dashboards

Dashboards offer a snapshot of current performance on select performance indicators, including targets and historical trends. There are three main types of Facilities-centric dashboards: a Facilities Management dashboard, dashboards for specific functions or departments (such as elevator maintenance or utilities), and sustainability dashboards.

Read More

Decide which metrics to elevate

Institutions need to narrow down hundreds of potential metrics into a list of 15 to 20 key performance indicators (KPIs). These hand-selected KPIs are defined as the institution-specific metrics that indicate progress toward strategic and operational objectives.

Section 1: Compendium of facilities metrics

700+ facilities metrics organized into ten categories, with suggested quick-start guides for each one. Download our editable version to ease your search.

Read More

Section 2: Leader-centric facilities metrics

Recommendations for metrics to share with specific audiences (e.g., board, CBO, president). Download our editable version.

Read More

Section 3: Select core performance metrics

Considerations for pinpointing core facilities metrics to elevate to a dashboard. Download our editable version to start the process of selecting your own metrics.

Read More

5-step metric selection filtering process

Use this five-step filtering process to help Facilities leaders identify the right group of metrics to elevate to a dashboard. The first two considerations filter metrics based on pragmatic limitations and strategic priorities, respectively. The third consideration ensures Facilities leaders identify leading rather than lagging indicators, and the fourth consideration accounts for unit- or institution-specific circumstances. The final consideration ensures an equitable distribution of metrics across functional or strategic categories.
  1. Apply a reality check

    Set aside metrics not readily accessible, regularly tracked, supported by reliable data, or easily communicated to others

  2. Map to strategic objectives

    Identify metrics that most directly measure progress on Facilities’ strategic objectives

  3. Swap lagging for leading metrics

    Where feasible, identify leading indicators in lieu of measures providing information “after the fact”

  4. Account for high-priority imperatives

    Add “hot-seat” metrics that shed light on pressing yet temporary areas of concern

  5. Ensure balance of metric categories

    Force trade-offs in over-represented areas by sorting metrics by function or strategic perspective

Deploy user-friendly dashboard layout and format

Poor design can make or break efforts to better leverage data. Effective dashboard layouts are concise with clear directionality and color-coding, have accessible data visualizations with context, and have metrics that are in a consistent time frame and are matched to strategic goals. Three common design mistakes are outlined below.
Read More

Insufficient context

Representative stakeholder questions:

  • Is the metric above or below the target?
  • Should the metric increase or decrease?
  • How does this compare to historical data?

Too much information

Representative stakeholder questions:

  • Where should I focus my attention?
  • What are the most important metrics?
  • Can you summarize this for me?

Overly complex visualizations

Representative stakeholder questions:

  • What do the different colors mean?
  • How do I interpret this graph?
  • What’s the difference between the trend lines?

Set principled performance targets and action triggers

Rigorous metric selection and a compelling dashboard format do not necessarily compel corrective action when performance lags. In fact, dashboards can be dramatically undermined by the failure to stipulate associated performance targets or action triggers: thresholds that signal underperformance on core metrics and mandate a response or action.

While often used synonymously, performance targets and action triggers serve different purposes. To ensure progress on selected metrics and compel action when performance lags, institutions should establish both.

  • Performance targets are fixed or ranged goals that drive progress on core metrics.
  • Action triggers (though less common than performance targets) represent the single-most effective tracking mechanism to ensure leaders respond to concerning data in a timely fashion.

Targets clarify performance goals, while triggers signal when goal achievement is highly unlikely without immediate corrective action.

Read More

This resource requires EAB partnership access to view.

Access the research report

Learn how you can get access to this resource as well as hands-on support from our experts through Strategic Advisory Services.

Learn More

Already a Partner?

Partner Log In