Toward the end of 2017, we learned that 89% percent of university provosts and presidents reported personally spending more time on campus climate issues in the past year, particularly as the volume and complexity of issues on campus have risen.
Addressing incidents and perceptions of bias on campus is a critical issue that can impact student wellness, institutional reputation, and the educational experience. However, it’s a complex issue to address. Many institutional attempts and responses have come under scrutiny recently, leaving administrators wondering how to appropriately balance protecting free speech with addressing student concerns about bias and safety.
This executive briefing is designed to help inform senior leaders across campus to consider Bias Response Teams (BRTs), and includes key terms, related lawsuits and legislation, and next steps you can take.
The rise of the bias response team (BRT)
Many colleges and universities use BRTs to manage and respond to bias incidents on campus. While these teams have existed on some campuses for many years, they have come under increased scrutiny and pressure due to recent debates and heightened tensions on campuses and across the country regarding free speech.The scope, activities, and impact of these teams vary widely, as do their reception on campus, based on a wide range of factors including institution type, student population, team structure, and team authority.
What is the role of the BRT on campus?
The scope, activities, and impact of BRTs vary widely from campus to campus, but they generally fall into one of two categories:
Those that respond to and resolve individual cases of bias, i.e. provide support to the reporter and potentially issue consequences to the student or group reported.
Those that receive reports for the exclusive purpose of collecting data to inform broad campus climate efforts.
Glossary and reading list
Sharpen your student affairs vocabulary and explore additional resources.