Skip navigation
Blog

Your guide to hyper-personalized enrollment marketing

A four-step framework to turn your aspirations into manageable action

June 11, 2025, By Ryan Gardner-Cook, PhD, Associate Director, Strategic Research

Hyper-personalization is one of the most promising ideas in modern enrollment marketing. Students’ expectations for personalized college outreach are rising fast, shaped by daily interactions with platforms like Spotify and TikTok that deliver content tailored to their interests, behaviors, and preferences. Many enrollment teams are already tailoring messages by funnel stage or major, but those efforts often feel limited compared to the dynamic, real-time personalization students have come to expect elsewhere. The result is a growing gap between what students experience in their consumer lives and what they encounter during the college search.

The goal is clear: give each student a personalized experience that reflects who they are, what they care about, and where they are in their journey. However, taking steps to reach that goal can quickly become overwhelming. That’s why we built a framework to help enrollment leaders scale personalization in realistic, achievable stages.

Why is now the moment for hyper-personalization?

Enrollment teams are quite adept at manually crafting personalized messages, but those efforts are labor-intensive and difficult to scale. In a recent EAB survey, 93% of students said personalized college outreach would make them more likely to explore a school. And yet, two-thirds report never receiving outreach that feels personal. The gap highlights a growing need to scale bespoke messaging in a sustainable way.

What, then, makes personalization at scale possible now? The data, tools, and infrastructure are finally catching up with the expectations—and ambition—of mass-customized enrollment marketing. Behavioral tracking, dynamic segmentation, and AI copy generation are no longer futuristic; they’re increasingly feasible and scalable across the funnel.

Personalization in College Recruitment Marketing: The Student’s Perspective

Key ingredients for successful hyper-personalization

Before diving into the four stages, it’s worth asking: What actually powers hyper-personalized outreach? After all, hyper-personalization is only as powerful as the data infrastructure that supports it. In addition to institutional and brand-level inputs, schools need a broad, well-organized set of student data. Our research outlines seven key categories that range from foundational traits (e.g., demographics and academic interests) to more advanced signals (e.g., behavior patterns, communication preferences, and personal values).

What sets this framework apart is its comprehensiveness. It moves beyond standard CRM fields to include how students think, what they care about, and how they behave, which are critical for creating messages that resonate. However, these categories don’t all become useful at once. Each plays a different role depending on how advanced a school’s hyper-personalization efforts are. That’s where the four-stage framework comes in: to help teams understand which data matter most when—and what they can do with that data at each step.

Getting started: The four stages of hyper-personalization

We’ve identified four core stages that describe how institutions can build their personalization capabilities over time. Each one reflects a step-change in:

  • The types of data collected
  • The systems and logic used to act on those data
  • The resulting level of personalization and orchestration enabled across channels

Each stage builds on the previous one, unlocking more responsive, relevant, and student-centered experiences while progressing toward the kind of predictive, seamless personalization students now expect from platforms like Netflix or TikTok.

Stage 1: Scalable personalization

At this first stage, personalization becomes scalable, if still simple. Institutions start using a combination of key traits such as major, GPA, or ZIP code to trigger variations in message content and flow. With generative AI, it’s now possible to create tailored content blocks across dozens of student types without writing every word from scratch.

Though it still requires a degree of editorial control that precludes full automation, this can make even basic outreach feel more relevant and respectful. The key is to make static data feel dynamic. If the messaging is crafted to reflect their key interests and context, even basic traits can be used to change the story a student receives.

What’s possible at Stage 1?

  • Trait-driven content blocks
  • Improved segmentation

What’s required for Stage 1?

  • A CRM that excels at managing comm flows
  • A student record with basic traits/preferences
  • Segmentation logic

Stage 2: Responsive personalization

Here, schools begin to personalize based on what students tell you: their preferences, goals, or concerns. Smart forms, chatbots, quizzes, and surveys power message logic that routes students into tailored journeys.

You’re also starting to coordinate across channels: the email connects to the form, which leads to a personalized landing page. It’s not yet fully orchestrated—but it’s moving in that direction.

What’s possible at Stage 2?

  • Responsive messaging
  • Dynamic landing pages
  • Smart form optimization
  • Early multichannel coordination

What’s required for Stage 2?

  • Smart forms, chatbots, surveys, or quizzes to collect student inputs
  • Logic-based campaign tools (e.g., branching flows or content swapping)

Does AI Personalization Improve Virtual Tour Engagement?

Stage 3: Dynamic personalization

This is the turning point. In Stage 3, student behavior begins to shape outreach. Now, your messaging can shift based on how students engage (or disengage). A student’s clicks, timing, recency of engagement and more determine message cadence, content, tone, and even channel.

The result is outreach that adapts in real time based on student behavior. Segments and content update dynamically as students interact with messages, landing pages, or websites. Students who go quiet receive different nudges than those who are clicking everything. This is where personalization starts to feel seamless.

What’s possible at Stage 3?

  • Behavior-shaped content
  • Dynamic segmentation
  • Timing and channel adaptation
  • Engagement-based prioritization
  • Unknown audience tracking

What’s required for Stage 3?

  • Behavioral tracking (web, email, chatbot, etc.)
  • Dynamic segmentation and scoring logic
  • Campaign tools that respond to recency and frequency of engagement

Stage 4: Predictive personalization

At this final stage, personalization is fully adaptive—and often invisible to the student. Messaging evolves in real time, powered by individual student data profiles and AI models that interpret behavior, predict intent, and adjust tone, timing, and channel accordingly.

The system doesn’t just match students to segments, it tailors the experience to the individual, even when they haven’t self-identified. From the first web visit to the final decision, students receive guidance that reflects their interests, concerns, and behavior without needing to repeat themselves or reintroduce their needs.

What’s possible at Stage 4?

  • Predictive targeting
  • Truly individualized messages
  • Cross-channel orchestration
  • Real-time web adaptation
  • Full stealth detection

What’s required for Stage 4?

  • Comprehensive, integrated, and continually updated student data
  • Predictive modeling and scoring logic
  • AI tools for content variation, timing, and channel orchestration

On-Demand Webinar: The Journey Toward Hyper-Personalized Enrollment Marketing

Why this framework matters

We built this model to help enrollment leaders answer one big question:

“Where are we now and what’s holding us back from going further?”

Rather than leap straight to predictive personalization, the framework outlines a manageable path. Schools can take stock of their current state, identify which capabilities are missing, and build from there.

Just moving from Stage 1 to Stage 2—adding smart forms and adapting based on student input—can make a real difference. So can tracking behavior to prioritize outreach or adjust message timing in Stage 3.

Want to go deeper?

Our new insight paper, Hyper-Personalized Enrollment Marketing: What it Looks Like, and How to Get There, outlines the full framework, includes readiness assessments, the data needed to activate hyper-personalization, as well as how these stages feel from the student perspective.

Ryan Gardner-Cook

Ryan Gardner-Cook, PhD

Associate Director, Strategic Research

Read Bio

More Blogs

Blog

The 2026 .edu accessibility mandate is coming—is your site content ready?

Here’s what you need to know about the 2026 ADA requirements, what they mean for your .edu, and…
Enrollment Blog
Blog

How to build a keyword strategy that drives enrollment

Explore how SEO for higher education works using keyword strategies that help universities increase visibility, organic traffic, and…
Enrollment Blog
Blog

Struggling to attract graduate students? Here are four ways to fix it

Here are four areas enrollment teams should focus on to enhance their graduate student recruitment strategies, based on…
Adult Education Blog

Great to see you today! What can I do for you?